Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Clin Nurs ; 32(15-16): 5037-5045, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314747

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze stress levels, sleep quality, sleepiness and chronotypes on emergency room (ER) professionals before and during the COVID-19. BACKGROUND: ER healthcare professionals are exposed to high stress levels, and they often present with poor sleep quality. DESIGN: Observational study conducted into two different phases (before the COVID-19 and during the first wave of the COVID-19). METHOD: Physicians, nurses and nursing assistants working in the ER were included. Stress, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and chronotypes were assessed by the Stress Factors and Manifestations Scale (SFMS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the Horne and Österberg Morningness-Eveningness questionnaire, respectively. The first phase of the study was performed between December 2019 and February 2020, and the second between April and June 2020. The STROBE checklist was used to report the present study. RESULTS: In total, 189 ER professionals in the pre-COVID-19 phase and 171 (of the initial 189) during COVID-19 were included. The proportion of workers with a morning circadian rhythm increased during the COVID-19, and stress levels were significantly higher during COVID-19 compared to the previous phase (38.34 ± 10.74 vs. 49.97 ± 15.81). ER professionals with poor sleep quality presented higher stress in the pre-COVID-19 phase (40.60 ± 10.71 vs. 32.22 ± 8.19) and during COVID-19 (55.27 ± 15.75 vs. 39.66 ± 9.75). Similarly, workers with excessive sleepiness had higher stress in the pre-COVID-19 phase (42.06 ± 10.95 vs. 36.64 ± 10.24) and during COVID-19 (54.67 ± 18.10 vs. 48.44 ± 14.75). Positive associations were also found between the SFMS and the PSQI, as well as with the ESS in both phases of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency room professionals had increased stress levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stress was particularly higher in those with poor sleep quality or with excessive daytime sleepiness. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These results should aim to impulse the implementation of measures to improve the working conditions of ER professionals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Pandemics , Sleepiness , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sleep , Circadian Rhythm , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(7)2022 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1785659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are continuously exposed to a high level of stress, especially emergency department professionals. In the present research, we aimed to determine the internal consistency and validity of the Stress Factors and Manifestations Scale for in-hospital and out-of-hospital emergency workers. METHODS: A quantitative, prospective, cross-sectional, and observational study including 269 emergency service professionals. RESULTS: The scale was composed of 21 items, with a Cronbach's α value of 0.908. The hospital workers (38.4 ± 10.8 vs. 35.1 ± 9.9, p = 0.014) and women (39.3 ± 11.4 vs. 34.2 ± 8.6, p < 0.001) had higher levels of stress. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the scale were adequate. CONCLUSION: In the present study, including in-hospital and out-of-hospital emergency workers, the Stress Factors and Manifestations Scale presented appropriate usefulness, internal consistency, and validity, with optimal predictive ability. Higher levels of anxiety, female gender, being less optimistic, and working in hospital emergency departments were related to increased stress levels. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and potentially extend the Stress Factors and Manifestations Scale to other contexts.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders , Personnel, Hospital , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 17(20)2020 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-983007

ABSTRACT

University students are predisposed to stress, which could be even higher in Nursing students since they are directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic given their health training and area of knowledge. Our purpose was to assess the stress levels of Nursing students before and during lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Murcia (Spain), its influence on taking an online exam and how it was affected by physical exercise. This was an observational and prospective study including Nursing students from the second year of the Nursing Degree from 3 February to 23 April 2020. Three measurements were performed: one before lockdown and two during lockdown. Stress increased substantially during lockdown. Financial, family or emotional problems, as well as physical exercise, also increased. Indeed, at 40 days of lockdown, those students with financial, family or emotional problems, and less physical exercise reported significantly higher stress levels. In addition, those who passed the online exam had lower stress levels compared to those who failed. In conclusion, during lockdown, stress in Nursing students increased. This could be triggered by students' personal problems, and physical exercise may be used as a way to reduce stress. Academic performance was better in those students reporting less stress.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Social Isolation/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Students, Nursing/psychology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
4.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ; 17(20):7383, 2020.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-843971

ABSTRACT

University students are predisposed to stress, which could be even higher in Nursing students since they are directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic given their health training and area of knowledge. Our purpose was to assess the stress levels of Nursing students before and during lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Murcia (Spain), its influence on taking an online exam and how it was affected by physical exercise. This was an observational and prospective study including Nursing students from the second year of the Nursing Degree from 3 February to 23 April 2020. Three measurements were performed: one before lockdown and two during lockdown. Stress increased substantially during lockdown. Financial, family or emotional problems, as well as physical exercise, also increased. Indeed, at 40 days of lockdown, those students with financial, family or emotional problems, and less physical exercise reported significantly higher stress levels. In addition, those who passed the online exam had lower stress levels compared to those who failed. In conclusion, during lockdown, stress in Nursing students increased. This could be triggered by students’personal problems, and physical exercise may be used as a way to reduce stress. Academic performance was better in those students reporting less stress.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL